The transparency report was out and the numbers were shocking. The world at this point can't get enough of Nova Technologies and they will never be able to get enough of the company.

Within ninety seconds, the report was trending globally.

The first wave of reactions came from the people who'd been waiting, refreshing Nova Technologies' page obsessively, their sleep schedules destroyed by anticipation.

"HOLY SHIT THE TOP EARNER MADE $17.6 MILLION IN ONE MONTH"

"Ten hours a day. TEN. HOURS. A. DAY. Average usage. People are LIVING in this thing."

"1.8 BILLION users and only 2,000 verified accounts. The ratio is INSANE."

"Math time: $260M revenue from 2,000 devices. That's $130,000 per device per month. PER DEVICE. Apple could NEVER."

But the raw numbers, shocking as they were, weren't what broke people's brains. It was the implications.

***

A popular gaming streamer on YouTube, who'd been tracking Nova Technologies religiously, went live immediately after reading the report. His hands were shaking as he pulled up the data.

"Okay. Okay. Let me just—" He rubbed his face, his 340,000 live viewers waiting. "The top earner made seventeen point six million dollars. In thirty days. From streaming video games."

He pulled up a comparison chart he'd prepared weeks ago, anticipating big numbers but not THIS big.

"For context? The highest-paid Twitch streamer last year made about $8 million. For the ENTIRE YEAR. This person made more than double that. In one month. And they're not even the only one! There are TWENTY people making over nine million a month on this platform."

His voice kept rising in pitch, disbelief overwhelming his usual measured analysis.

"I've been streaming for seven years. SEVEN YEARS. I have 4.3 million subscribers. I make good money, I'm not complaining about my life. But I made $340,000 last year. That was a fantastic year for me. That was career-best numbers."

He pulled up the report's breakdown showing the bottom 50% of Lucid creators.

"The bottom-tier creators on Lucid—the people in the BOTTOM FIFTY PERCENT—are making seven thousand to eighty-five thousand dollars. Per month. The worst-performing Lucid creator is making $84,000 a year minimum, and that's if they're at the absolute bottom of the bottom tier."

He laughed, but it sounded slightly unhinged.

"I'm in the top one percent of YouTube creators by subscriber count. Top one percent! And the bottom half of Lucid creators are making comparable money to me. The TOP Lucid creators are making fifty times what I make. In a month."

The chat was moving too fast to read, but the sentiment was clear: every content creator watching was having an existential crisis in real-time.

"And here's the thing," he continued, his voice dropping. "I can't even GET a Lucid device. I tried. I clicked the instant it went live. Gone in one second. There are two thousand people in the entire world who have access to this economy, and I'm not one of them."

He pulled up the lottery statistics someone had calculated.

"If there are two hundred million people trying to buy Lucid devices each month, and they're releasing three thousand units, my odds are 0.0015%. I have a better chance of being struck by lightning. Twice."

***

The conversation on Reddit's r/NovaGate had evolved beyond number-crunching into something more existential.

THE DIGITAL CASTE SYSTEM IS REAL

u/SocialTheoryMajor: "We're watching the formation of a new aristocracy in real-time, and it's PURELY based on luck. Not talent, not wealth, not connections—just luck. You either won the lottery and got a Lucid device, or you didn't. And if you didn't, you're permanently locked out of an economy where the bottom earners make six figures."

u/FormerEconProf: "This is actually more disturbing than traditional wealth inequality. At least with conventional systems, there's a THEORY that you can work hard and climb the ladder. It's mostly bullshit, but the theory exists. With Nova Tech? If you didn't get a device, no amount of hard work matters. The door is closed."

u/DigitalNomad2025: "Counter-point: it's the most FAIR system imaginable. Presidents and janitors have equal odds. Billionaires can't buy their way in. It's pure chance. That's more fair than any system we've ever had."

u/SocialTheoryMajor: "Fair in ACCESS, but the OUTCOMES are catastrophically unequal. The top 1% of Lucid creators are capturing 39% of all income. That's worse than most countries' wealth distribution. We've created a perfectly fair lottery that leads to perfectly unfair results."

u/PhilosophyGrad: "It's the Rawlsian nightmare. Everyone has equal opportunity to enter, but once you're in, the inequality is staggering. And because entry is 'fair,' nobody can complain about the outcome without sounding like a sore loser."

The thread had 47,000 comments and was still growing.

***

Financial news networks had interrupted their morning programming. CNBC brought on a panel of economists, and the discussion immediately went off the rails.

"Ten hours a day," one economist repeated, staring at the report on his tablet. "The average user is spending ten hours a day on this platform. That's more time than most people WORK."

"It's replacing jobs," another panelist said. "Not in the sense that it's automating work—it's replacing the entire concept of traditional employment for the people who have access to it."

"Two thousand people are earning creator income," the moderator noted. "But 1.8 billion people are spending ten hours a day on the platform. What are those 1.8 billion people DOING?"

"Consuming content, presumably. Which raises another question—where are they finding ten hours a day? Are people not sleeping? Not working? This represents a fundamental reallocation of human attention and time."

A third economist jumped in, visibly agitated. "Can we talk about the concentration at the top? The top twenty creators are making $238 million combined. That's $238 million going to twenty people. In one month. This isn't an economy—it's a extraction machine funneling wealth to a tiny elite."

"But those twenty people are providing value," someone countered. "They're creating content that 1.8 billion people want to consume."

"Are they creating $238 million worth of value? Or have we just created a system where attention naturally concentrates on a few people and the money follows?"

The moderator tried to regain control of the conversation, but it was clear nobody had answers. They were all just shouting questions at each other, trying to make sense of numbers that defied every economic model they understood.

***

On Twitter, a sociology professor posted a thread that went viral within minutes:

"The Nova Technologies transparency report reveals something fascinating about human behavior at scale. Let's talk about the 10-hour average daily usage. (1/12)

For context, the average American watches 3-4 hours of TV per day. Social media usage averages 2-3 hours. Netflix reports their average user watches about 1.5 hours daily. (2/12)

Lucid users are averaging 10 HOURS per day. That's more than DOUBLE the combined time people spend on all other entertainment. Where is this time coming from? (3/12)

Theory: Lucid isn't replacing one activity. It's replacing MULTIPLE activities. People are socializing, gaming, watching content, AND working out all in LucidNet. It's become a life-replacement system. (4/12)

The 98.9% daily active rate is equally telling. Nearly EVERYONE who owns a Lucid uses it EVERY SINGLE DAY. That's not entertainment. That's dependency. (5/12)

Now combine this with the income concentration. Twenty people are making life-altering wealth. Two thousand people are making good-to-excellent income. And 1.8 billion people are spending half their waking hours in a system that extracts their attention and channels it toward those 2,000. (6/12)

This is the most efficient attention-to-wealth conversion system ever created. And it's 'fair' because everyone had equal lottery odds to be a creator. But fairness of ACCESS doesn't equal fairness of OUTCOME. (7/12)

The question nobody's asking: what happens when Month 3 adds another 3,000 devices? Month 4 another 3,000? At what point does the system break? (8/12)

Or does it never break? What if we're watching the formation of a permanent digital aristocracy where 0.0001% of the population earns millions while billions spend their lives consuming? (9/12)

And here's the disturbing part: people LOVE it. The lottery seems fair. The content is engaging. The top creators seem talented and deserve success. Nobody feels exploited because everyone chose to participate. (10/12)

This is how you build a system that's simultaneously voluntary, engaging, and fundamentally extractive. Make the entry lottery fair, make the content good enough, and people will willingly reorganize their entire lives around it. (11/12)

We're not watching a company disrupt an industry. We're watching the voluntary restructuring of human society around a digital platform. And it's happening faster than anyone predicted. (12/12)"

The thread was retweeted 340,000 times in six hours.

***

But perhaps the most telling reaction came from the Lucid creators themselves.

The bottom-tier creators—the ones making $7,000-$85,000 monthly—were ecstatic. Life-changing money had fallen into their laps through pure lottery luck. They posted celebratory messages, shared their success stories, talked about paying off student loans and buying their first homes.

The mid-tier creators—making $85,000-$650,000 monthly—were conflicted. Grateful for the income but acutely aware of the massive gap between them and the top earners. They could see the top twenty creators pulling away, capturing more audience share, building unstoppable momentum.

The top-tier creators stayed mostly silent. A few posted generic thank-you messages. But the top earner, who'd made $17.6 million in thirty days, said nothing at all.

That silence spoke volumes.

***

And as the day wear on and more people waje up to discover the report, one sentiment would keep appearing across every platform, in every language, in every community:

"I need a Lucid device."

Not "I want." NEED.

Because the transparency report had made something crystal clear: this wasn't about owning cool technology anymore. It was about access to an economy that made traditional employment look quaint. It was about joining a system where even the bottom performers made comfortable middle-class income.

And only 2,000 people in the entire world had access.

The next pre-order event was four weeks away. And every single person who'd read that transparency report would be there, clicking frantically, hoping their luck would finally change.

Because the alternative—being locked out forever while watching others live in abundance—was becoming unbearable.

Nova Technologies had created more than a product. They'd created digital feudalism, wrapped in the aesthetics of fairness, and made it so appealing that billions of people were begging for the chance to participate.

And the truly terrifying part? It was working exactly as designed.

And as if all that wasn't enough, Nova Technologies dropped yet another shocking announcement.

If you find any errors ( broken links, non-standard content, etc.. ), Please let us know < report chapter > so we can fix it as soon as possible.