The paper inside the envelope was thick and expensive, the kind of stationery that suggested whoever had written this message had access to quality materials and wanted to project an image of sophistication and seriousness. The handwriting was somewhat neat thought it looked like he was shaking and he tried to hide. It was also impersonal, probably deliberately designed to avoid being distinctive enough to identify.

I unfolded the letter and began reading.

I know about the trade between you and Gabriel.

The opening line hit like a physical blow. My Instinct had been correct about the eavesdropper hearing our sensitive conversation. The worst-case scenario I had been worrying about all day was confirmed in stark black ink.

If you don't want to be exposed, you will do the following:

1. Accept Gabriel's proposal to provide consultation on evasion tactics in exchange for the informant's contact information.

2. Once you receive the informant's details, you will deliver that information to the address provided at the bottom of this letter.

Failure to comply with either condition will result in your conversation being shared with President Santos, the Brazilian government, and relevant international media outlets. Your credibility as an international consultant will be destroyed, your diplomatic mission will collapse, and your coalition against the World President will lose one of its most valuable assets.

You have until project completion to fulfill these terms.

The signature was simply a symbol I didn't recognize, something that could have been a gang mark, a personal sigil, or just a meaningless flourish designed to look important.

I read the letter three times, analyzing every word while my various skills worked to process the implications of what I was being forced to do.

This was blackmail in its purest form. Someone had obtained compromising information about my private discussions and was now using that knowledge to extract specific actions that served their interests while threatening to destroy me professionally if I refused.

But the situation was more complicated than simple extortion.

The demands actually helped me in some ways, even as they made things worse in others.

The requirement to accept Gabriel's proposal eliminated the decision paralysis I had been struggling with for two weeks. I no longer had to weigh moral compromises against strategic benefits, because the choice had been made for me through external coercion. I would accept the deal, provide the consultation Gabriel wanted, and receive the informant's contact information that could potentially identify the World President.

In that sense, the blackmail removed my agency but also removed my responsibility for the ethical compromise involved.

But it also forced me into a course of action I might have ultimately rejected. If I had decided that helping a criminal organization evade justice was too high a price to pay for intelligence, I would have been able to maintain my ethical integrity even at the cost of passing up a valuable opportunity. Now that option was gone, replaced by compulsion backed by the threat of total professional destruction.

And more than that, I was being forced to betray Gabriel's trust by sharing the informant's contact information with whoever had written this letter.

That aspect troubled me more than I expected. Gabriel had proposed a deal based on mutual benefit and enlightened self-interest. He had been straightforward about what he wanted and what he could offer, operating with a kind of criminal honor that I could at least respect even if I couldn't approve of his broader activities.

But now I would be accepting his offer while secretly planning to compromise the very intelligence he was providing, turning our negotiation into a trap that would benefit some unknown third party.

The question of who had written this letter was driving me toward increasingly paranoid analysis.

It could be a gang member, someone from the Jaguars organization who Gabriel hadn't shared his plans with. Maybe they wanted access to the informant for their own purposes, or maybe they were trying to force me into accepting the deal while ensuring Gabriel got the help he wanted. That scenario would suggest internal politics within the criminal organization, with different factions pursuing different strategies.

It could be a government official, someone working within Santos's administration who had their own agenda beyond official Brazilian policy. They might want the informant's information for personal power, or they might be working for another nation's intelligence services and using me as an unwitting intermediary. That scenario was concerning because it suggested corruption within the very government I was trying to build diplomatic relationships with.

It could be some unknown third party, someone completely separate from both the gang and the government who had somehow gained access to the diplomatic residence for surveillance purposes. Foreign intelligence services, private contractors, independent operators working for wealthy individuals who wanted information about the World President for their own reasons. That scenario was the most unsettling because it suggested my activities were being monitored by players I hadn't even identified yet.

Hell, it could even be a gang member deliberately creating this situation to force me into accepting Gabriel's deal while maintaining plausible deniability about any coercion. If I thought I was being blackmailed by an outside party, I might be more likely to follow through with helping Gabriel escape rather than trying to find ways to minimize my cooperation. That scenario suggested a level of psychological manipulation that was almost admirable in its cynicism.

I looked down at the bottom of the letter where an address had been written in the same neat, impersonal handwriting.

Rua das Flores, 847, Third floor, Blue door. Place the information in an envelope and slide it under the door between midnight and 2 AM on the night you receive it from Gabriel. Do not attempt to identify who retrieves it. Do not attempt surveillance or tracking. Any deviation from these instructions will result in immediate exposure.

The instructions were specific and designed to minimize my ability to identify the blackmailer or interfere with their retrieval of the information. The narrow time window and strict behavioral constraints suggested whoever had written this had experience with covert information exchanges and knew how to protect their anonymity.

I sat down at my desk, still holding the letter while my mind raced through various responses and countermeasures I could potentially employ.

I could refuse to comply and accept the exposure. That would maintain my ethical integrity and avoid compromising whatever intelligence Gabriel's informant possessed. But it would also destroy my diplomatic credibility, collapse the restoration project, eliminate any chance of securing Brazilian support against the World President, and potentially expose Evelyn and Anthony to collateral damage from the scandal.

I could comply partially, accepting Gabriel's deal but providing false or misleading information to the blackmailer. That might protect the actual intelligence while appearing to fulfill the terms of the extortion. But if the blackmailer had ways to verify the information's authenticity, false compliance would just trigger the threatened exposure while also burning my relationship with Gabriel.

I could attempt to identify the blackmailer and eliminate the threat through confrontation or counter-blackmail. But the letter had specifically warned against surveillance or tracking attempts, and whoever had written this was clearly experienced enough to anticipate and counter such efforts.

Or I could simply accept the situation and comply with both demands, helping Gabriel while also compromising his intelligence to the mysterious third party, and hope that the resulting complications could be managed once I understood more about the larger strategic situation.

None of these options were good. All of them involved compromises or risks that I would have preferred to avoid.

But I didn't really have a choice, did I?

The blackmailer had structured this situation to leave me with exactly one viable path forward. Accept Gabriel's proposal, obtain the informant's information, deliver it to the designated address, and deal with whatever consequences emerged from those actions.

I carefully folded the letter and placed it in a secure location where it wouldn't be accidentally discovered. Then I sat back in my chair and tried to process everything that had just been forced upon me.

In the end, I told myself, trying to find some comfort in the strategic logic of the situation, it was going to be fine.

I would barely help Gabriel. Just enough consultation on evasion tactics to fulfill our agreement, providing theoretical knowledge without specific operational guidance that would make his crimes easier to commit. He would get the assistance he had negotiated for, and I would maintain plausible deniability about the extent of my cooperation.

I would get Santos's trust and support by completing the restoration project successfully, demonstrating value as an international partner, and securing Brazilian participation in the coalition against authoritarian forces. The blackmail situation would remain hidden, allowing the diplomatic mission to proceed without the complications that exposure would create.

And most importantly, I would finally have a lead on hunting down the World President.

Whether that lead came through Gabriel's informant or through whatever third party was forcing me to share that information, I would have access to intelligence networks that could potentially identify the most dangerous threat to democratic governance in the current international system.

The costs were significant, the ethical compromises were uncomfortable, and the potential for things to go catastrophically wrong was higher than I wanted to acknowledge.

But I would get what I needed to advance my primary mission objective. I would find the World President, expose their identity, and eliminate their ability to operate with anonymous impunity while building authoritarian coalitions.

That goal was worth almost any price, including being blackmailed into helping criminals and compromising intelligence sources to unknown third parties.

At least, that's what I told myself as I sat alone in my room, holding a letter that had just eliminated any remaining agency I had over my own ethical choices.

Tomorrow I would accept Gabriel's proposal. Tomorrow I would commit to a course of action that would change everything about my mission in Brazil and potentially my entire approach to international diplomacy.

But tonight, I would try to sleep, knowing that the decision had been made for me by someone who understood exactly how to exploit my priorities and my vulnerabilities.

If you find any errors ( broken links, non-standard content, etc.. ), Please let us know < report chapter > so we can fix it as soon as possible.